Propositional Logic

recap

 

Negation

“\(\lnot\)”

 
  \(p\) \(\lnot p\)  
T F
F T

Oh, and

\[\displaystyle \lnot\lnot p\equiv p \]

Conjunction

“\(\land\)”

 
  \(p\) \(q\) \(p\land q\)  
T T T
T F F
F T F
F F F

Disjunction

“\(\lor\)”

 
  \(p\) \(q\) \(p\lor q\)  
T T T
T F T
F T T
F F F

Implication

“\(\rightarrow\)”

 
  \(p\) \(q\) \(p\rightarrow q\)  
T T T
T F F
F T T
F F T

Implication is not Causality!

 

“English” is much, much richer. Logical formula are meant to be read literally.

Six Eggs

Equivalences

“\(\equiv\)”

 

Some formulae are equivalent truth-wise.

Equivalences

proof by truth table

 

If two formula have the same truth table, then they are equivalent (\(“\equiv”\)).

E.g.,

  \(p\) \(q\) \(\lnot p\lor q\) \(p\rightarrow q\)  
T T T T
T F F F
F T T T
F F T T

Equivalences

problems proving equivalence by truth table?

 
 

You will have to prove things like this later in the course!

Equivalences

...and then the mapping problem

 

Tautologies & Fallacies

“\(\equiv\)”

 

Applications

of propositional logic

 

Meta Reasoning

 

Logical Paradox

 

What is paradox?

How does it arise?

 
Genie Wish

Propositional Logic

What is it not good for?

 

Let us fix this last one now!