![]() |
Instructor GuidelinesComputer Science |
Experienced faculty and the undergraduate coordinator will help you learn the ropes.
For examples of on-line information refered in the body of this document, it is best to look at www pages for courses in this term and previous terms and in the course files on Prism under /cs/dept/course
If an anomalous grade profile exists, you must submit an anomalous grade report, for approval by CEAS (Committee on Examinations and Academic Standards), to the academic director of FPAS with a copy to the undergraduate coordinator of COSC. CEAS would like a rationale, together with a breakdown of the components comprising the final grade, their weighting, e.g. % class tests, % exam, % assignments etc., and the distributions for each component.
If the period of time is more than a couple of weeks after the examination period, then the student should petition their home faculty for a deferment.
Course directors do not have to agree to deferred standing unless they are convinced that either the grounds are valid and the circumstance has been documented sufficiently to be convincing. If an instructor does not want to sign a deferred standing agreement form, they should inform the student that the student may petition for deferred standing.
Deferred final examinations are organized by the course director -- setting of the time with consultation with the student (especially if a deferred examination is granted by petition), finding the room and having invigilation.
Petition forms and procedures are obtained from the Registrar's office and typically take months. Students petition their home faculty -- neither the undergraduate office nor the departmental petitions committee deal with deferred standing petitions. Petitions require instructors to fill out a Course Performance Summary form that states what work the student has or has not done, what grades they got, what the due dates where, by when did students know their grades and other information. Students take course performance summary forms to course director, who can either give completed form back to the student, or send the form directly to the registrar's office. Students can also submit the course performance summary forms to the undergraduate office. The undergraduate office forwards the form to the appropriate course director or, if the course director is not avaialable, fills in the form as best it can from the grades information course directors give to the office (see the section Telling the Department the final grades).
These are handled by the instructor, or course director in multisection courses that are coordinated. The student must make the request within 14 days of the the grades being made available (not when a particular student found out about the grade).
On accepting the reevaluation, the student should be informed that the grade may go up, may remain the same, or may go down.
The instructor reevaluates the entire work, answering the specific points the student brought up, and addressing other points that may surface during the reevaluation.
Student is informed of the result of the revaluation. I very strongly recommend that this be recorded in the infoFile. Please see the section Recording extra student interactions, it is important as it saves the large amount of time wasted on just one problem with not recording every special case.
Final examinations and final grades
If it is a simple matter of recomputing the final grade in that the student detected a recording error in one or more pieces of work, or a calculation error in computing the final grade, then these are handled by the instructor.
Reevaluation of final examinations is handled by the Departmental petitions committee. The request must be made within 21 days of the grade being sent by the registrar's office.
The student fills out the petition form stating exactly what the problem is and what remedy they would like. Revaluations of the final examination require stating exactly what parts they think were under/over evaluated and why they think so. A request to reevaluate in hope of having a higher grade will be rejected.
The Department petitions committee either rejects the petition or grants the petition. If a final examination is to be reevaluated, the petititons committee gives it to the course director if the examination was marked by many people (e.g. 1520, 1530, 1020, 1030 and other multisection courses have TAs and multiple instructors marking), or gives it to another faculty member for reevaluation, if the instructor was the only person to make the original evaluation. The objective is to have an independent second opinion.
The result of the petition is mailed to the student. The final grade may go up, may go down, or may remain the same.
Do not post solutions to problems on the web. It causes problems for instructors everywhere now and in the future because students search the web for solutions.
Course | TA hours/student |
---|---|
1020 | 3 |
1030 | 1.3 |
1520/30 | 1 |
1540 | 1.6 |
2xxx | 1.3 |
3xxx | 1.3 (1.5 for Digital Logic) |
4xxx | 1 (for large classes (>= 30 students)) |
TAs are used to invigilate final examinations, hold office hours, mark assignments, be available in Prism (1000-level normally), preparse solutions. About 10% is allocated to meetings with the instructor -- for example, to learn marking guidelines, brief the instructor on student problems in assignments and office hours. So schedule your assignments accordingly.
For TAs who are graduate students (called Unit I) you have to fill in a workload form at the beginning of the term outlining the number of hours they will do at each task. A second form is filled in about halfway through the term as a checkpoint. You are not bound by the hours on the first form, it is a guideline to the instructor and TA as to what may be done. All the work is considered to be equivalent by the union, so you can reallocate hours during the term as circumstances dictate, as long as you do not exceed the maximum number of hours allocated to the course.
While workload forms are not required for TAs that are not graduate students (called Unit II), it is a good policy to use them to minimize misunderstandings that may arise.
Workload forms are obtained from the graduate assistant. The TAs should bring them to the initial meeting.
In multi-section courses with common assignments, it convenient to pool the TAs and have one instructor in charge for each task. For example, in 2011 with 2 sections and 4 TAS, you can have 3 different TAs work in rotation on different assignments, while the instructors rotate as who is in charge. This helps distribute the load.
![]() |